Turning scattered public
signal into a ranked picture.
We run large-scale research projects that collect, score and compare performance across dozens or hundreds of branches, facilities or locations.
150+
branch-level units scored in a single project
branch-level units scored in a single project
81
provinces covered in a single national dataset
provinces covered in a single national dataset
16+
independent sources cross-referenced per location
independent sources cross-referenced per location
100
point scale, built to be defended, not just read
point scale, built to be defended, not just read
THE SCORE MODEL
One number,
built from two.
Every location gets a single comparable score out of 100 — but it’s never a blind average. It’s built from a weighted quantitative layer and a qualitative theme layer, combined on purpose.
Quantitative Perception Score
70 pts
70 pts
Qualitative Theme Score
30 pts
30 pts
Locations below a minimum data threshold are marked with a low-confidence flag rather than scored with false precision.
HOW A PROJECT MOVES
From scope
to score.
Every project runs through the same five stages, regardless of network size.
01 — Scope the network
Define the topic, the full list of locations, and the question leadership needs answered.
02 — Design the scoring model
Fix source weights and confidence thresholds before a single record is collected.
03 — Collect, source by source
Gather feedback per location across every source in the model, in ordered batches.
04 — Score consistently
Apply the fixed model across every location so scores stay comparable end to end.
05 — Deliver the report
Produce the finished report in institutional format, with follow-up support as the network evolves.
WHAT WE COMPARE
Rank, don’t
just report.
A sample view of what a location comparison looks like once scored — illustrative, not a live dataset.
WHAT WE DELIVER
Three parts,
one finished report.
Each project produces the same three deliverables, sized to the network.
01
Branch & Location Comparison
A consistent, weighted score per branch or facility, ranked side by side across the full network.
02
Scoring Methodology
The model itself — source weights, confidence rules and theme scoring — documented and defensible.
03
Institutional Report
Per-location scores, standout themes and decision-ready notes, in a consistent finished format.
TRUSTED BY ORGANIZATIONS
