{"id":9131,"date":"2026-09-03T13:56:04","date_gmt":"2026-09-03T10:56:04","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.lf.com.tr\/?page_id=9131"},"modified":"2026-09-03T14:06:43","modified_gmt":"2026-09-03T11:06:43","slug":"research","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/www.lf.com.tr\/tr\/research\/","title":{"rendered":"Ara\u015ft\u0131rmalar"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/div>
<\/div>
INSIGHTS \/ RESEARCH<\/h6>\n<\/div><\/div>
<\/div>

Turning scattered public
\nsignal into a ranked<\/span> picture.
\n<\/strong><\/h1>\n<\/div><\/div>
<\/div>

We run large-scale research projects that collect, score and compare performance across dozens or hundreds of branches, facilities or locations.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/section>

150+<\/span>
\nbranch-level units scored in a single project<\/span><\/div>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>
81<\/span>
\nprovinces covered in a single national dataset<\/span><\/div>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>
16+<\/span>
\nindependent sources cross-referenced per location<\/span><\/div>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>
100<\/span>
\npoint scale, built to be defended, not just read<\/span><\/div>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/section>
THE SCORE MODEL<\/h6>\n<\/div><\/div>
<\/div>

One number,
\nbuilt from two.<\/h2>\n<\/div><\/div>
<\/div>

Every location gets a single comparable score out of 100 \u2014 but it’s never a blind average. It’s built from a weighted quantitative layer and a qualitative theme layer, combined on purpose.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>

\n
Quantitative Perception Score<\/span>
\n70 pts<\/span><\/div>\n
\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
Qualitative Theme Score<\/span>
\n30 pts<\/span><\/div>\n
\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

Locations below a minimum data threshold are marked with a low-confidence flag rather than scored with false precision.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/section>

HOW A PROJECT MOVES<\/h6>\n<\/div><\/div>
<\/div>

From scope
\nto score.<\/h2>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>

Every project runs through the same five stages, regardless of network size.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>

<\/div>
\n
\n

01 \u2014 Scope the network<\/h3>\n

Define the topic, the full list of locations, and the question leadership needs answered.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

02 \u2014 Design the scoring model<\/h3>\n

Fix source weights and confidence thresholds before a single record is collected.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

03 \u2014 Collect, source by source<\/h3>\n

Gather feedback per location across every source in the model, in ordered batches.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

04 \u2014 Score consistently<\/h3>\n

Apply the fixed model across every location so scores stay comparable end to end.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

05 \u2014 Deliver the report<\/h3>\n

Produce the finished report in institutional format, with follow-up support as the network evolves.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/section>

WHAT WE COMPARE<\/h6>\n<\/div><\/div>
<\/div>

Rank, don’t
\njust report.<\/h2>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>

A sample view of what a location comparison looks like once scored \u2014 illustrative, not a live dataset.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>

<\/div>
\n
LOCATION<\/span>
\nSCORE<\/span>
\nDISTRIBUTION<\/span><\/div>\n
Branch A<\/span>
\n87<\/span><\/p>\n
\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
Branch B<\/span>
\n74<\/span><\/p>\n
\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
Branch C<\/span>
\n61<\/span><\/p>\n
\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
Branch D low confidence<\/span><\/span>
\n52<\/span><\/p>\n
\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/section>
WHAT WE DELIVER<\/h6>\n<\/div><\/div>
<\/div>

Three parts,
\none finished report.<\/h2>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>

Each project produces the same three deliverables, sized to the network.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>

<\/div>
\n

01<\/span><\/p>\n

Branch & Location Comparison<\/h3>\n

A consistent, weighted score per branch or facility, ranked side by side across the full network.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>

\n

02<\/span><\/p>\n

Scoring Methodology<\/h3>\n

The model itself \u2014 source weights, confidence rules and theme scoring \u2014 documented and defensible.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>

\n

03<\/span><\/p>\n

Institutional Report<\/h3>\n

Per-location scores, standout themes and decision-ready notes, in a consistent finished format.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/section>

TRUSTED BY ORGANIZATIONS<\/h2>\n<\/div><\/div>
<\/div>